Evaluate a New Mission for Truax Field
This spring the Air Force ignored local opposition and promoted environmental racism by selecting the 115th Fighter Wing at Truax Field to receive a squadron of F-35 fighter jets costing $1.5 billion. If we want the 115th Fighter Wing to be an asset to our community, we should find a new mission other than training fighter jet pilots that is appropriate and compatible for our urban area. We need a mission that doesn’t place its environmental and economic costs on the shoulders of those with low incomes or people of color forced to live adjacent to the base, or on the thousands of people who live on the east and north sides of Madison. We ask that Governor Evers and Adjutant General Knapp begin the process of finding a new mission for the 115th Fighter Wing.
The Air Force’s decision to deploy a squadron of F-35A fighter jets at Truax Field was controversial, as thousands of Madison residents registered their opposition. Of the 6,419 comments submitted on the draft Environmental Impact Statement for five potential sites, 89% were submitted regarding Truax. Numerous local organizations, including our Common Council and School Board, opposed the beddown. The EIS concluded that Truax was one of two sites where “there will be disproportionate impacts to low income and minority populations, as well as children.” Interestingly, the other site with disproportionate impacts, Montgomery, Alabama, was the second site chosen by the Air Force for the new jets. The EIS stated that Truax Field would experience the greatest environmental impacts of all sites, even though the statement did not even consider noise and safety impacts on the surrounding urban area and the 60,000 people living within three miles of the base.
By selecting Truax Field, the Air Force showed exceedingly poor and irresponsible judgement. Its decision ignored the values of Madison residents and our plans for a sustainable and livable city for ourselves and our children. The selection of Truax required the Air Force to ignore environmental justice and promote environmental racism. The Air Force ignored the current PFAS contamination of our groundwater, Starkweather Creek and Lake Monona by the ANG at Truax, and exposure of area residents to PFAS in our drinking water and fish.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and recent police killing of an unarmed, defenseless Black man in Minneapolis further accentuated a range of concerns regarding the recklessness and racism of the proposed selection of Truax for the F-35 squadron. We were unprepared to defend ourselves against the new virus, so why are we spending $1.5 billion on a squadron of fighter jets? If we are committed to combating racism in Madison and Wisconsin, why will we continue exposing Black and other minority families of color living adjacent to Truax Field to the pollution and violence of these jets?
Since we cannot trust the Air Force to consider impacts on Madison and Wisconsin residents, we are turning to Governor Evers and Adjutant General Knapp of the Wisconsin National Guard to look out for us, promote Wisconsin values and end this disturbing example of environmental racism. The long-term mission of the 115th Fighter Wing at Truax Field has been training fighter jet pilots. This mission is no longer suitable for our growing urban area, especially when the greatest impacts fall on those least able to defend themselves. The Air Force currently has 44 possible missions for ANG units, most of which do not require fighter jet training. For your information, Table 1 summarizes these missions. Given these alternative missions, we ask that you evaluate and select a new mission for the 115th Fighter Wing that would be compatible with our residential area, one that supports and improves our community, rather than one that, according to the EIS, will sicken our residents, make us less safe, and reduce our quality of life.
The 115th should have a mission that provides us civil defense in times of catastrophe and emergency, rather than a mission that wages war with a first strike, nuclear-equipped offensive weapon like the F-35. Hosting such an offensive weapon seems ludicrous when our current security threats now come from cyber attacks and terrorism, neither of which the F-35 can counter.
There are several examples of ANG units which have changed their mission. In 2013, the New Mexico Air National Guard’s 150th Fighter Wing changed from a fighter mission to training crews in special operations and personnel recovery. In 2016, the Montana 120th Airlift Wing switched from flying F-15 fighter jets to the C-130 and transport aircraft. In 2018, the Air Force Times reported on the increasing need for mobility aircraft to deliver critical equipment and supplies to military forces stateside and overseas, and for humanitarian and diplomatic missions. It found that during the 2017 hurricane season, Air Force mobility teams flew nearly 1,500 flights, delivering 28 million pounds of supplies to victims of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. The Air Force estimated that the F-35 squadron would add only 64 jobs. Switching to another mission would provide far more jobs to Truax Field, jobs that would be beneficial to our community.
Other examples include scientific, engineering or weather missions for the 115th which would complement the enormous knowledge base available at the UW campus. In an April 1st news release, the Wisconsin National Guard explained all the ways it was helping combat the current pandemic. A permanent medical mission for the 115th would complement our forward-looking economy grounded in health services.
Rather than continuing the divisive proposal to bring F-35 fighter jets to Truax Field in Madison, let’s work to find a new mission for the 115th Fighter Wing that benefits the entire community, one of which we can all be proud. The new F-35 fighter jets will not arrive until 2023 so we should begin the evaluation now to find a more suitable and compatible mission.
originally published July 2020